Recently,
the Kosovo parliament unilaterally proclaimed independence from Serbia . The significance of this fits into a Balkan conflict
unresolved since the Ottoman Empire lost its hegemony over the territories to which he ruled with an iron fist. This case is far more recent response to the legacy of Tito
, unifier of Yugoslavia after World War II, but less likely to stop using a government-type dictatorial socialist federation for their purposes. On the death of Titus, the wars between some federations followed, where Serbia was losing influence. This was due to two facts:
- The first is that it never recognized the unique differences from other federations (which had enough of a dictatorship), and therefore refused to find solution through dialogue and democratic.
- The second is that any act violently fought apartheid / independence, consuming indiscriminate killings against defenseless civilian populations. Obviously, these crimes were committed a number of individuals covered by an ultra-nationalist regime, not the people of Serbia itself.

Serbia is backed by Russia, its only ally in this whole mess. Interestingly, the people of Serbia has a high nationalist component has been strengthened by the war. Think, so to speak, they have stolendo what belonged to them. Keep in mind that the Serbian empire, dates from the eleventh century. In the early nineteenth century, the Serbs were among the first to beat the Turks, as well as those who managed, after World War I, the first modern unification of Yugoslavia (1929). It was precisely the Nazis who separated this issue in Serbia, Montenegro and Croatia. Along with this, the Serbs fail to understand why the disintegration of Yugoslavia.
Apart from the two facts mentioned, the former Yugoslavia is a melting pot of cultures, religions and micro-autonomous from each other. This has been due to a land-bound transition-between the Balkans and central Europe. Thus, different populationspray and different influences have come together in moments of history also mixed. However, as in other locations involved a process of synthesis and convergence, here each maintained its own system of customs, culture and social interactions. There was just the process of integration beyond the "iron hands" of their rulers.
In itself, Kosovo is not significant from an economic standpoint. His situation was abnormal. There had been some killings
intervenino and NATO in favor of Kosovo's population, creating de facto
, a protectorate over the area. If Kosovo is independent, it can be thanks to EU funding and support of the USA. By itself, it is a viable statethat is approved by the United Nations since it was a English colony. And it rained! So many dead and equal or more killings have occurred there. The difference is that Morocco is in the orbit of the USA (not Serbia) and France. This will describe the political landscape of the world.
Incredibly, the Basque government spokeswoman Miren Azkarate
Kosovo declares that
is a lesson on how to resolve conflict peacefully and democratically
identity and belonging, implying that was what should be respect to the Basque Country (or something similar). That is, the Basques have to suffer a war and killing for, then comes the army of NATO to put